The information below focuses on ificant voting cases that remain pending or affect the election.
This list does not include cases pertaining to candidacy issues, ballot initiatives, or redistricting. For cases active in the post-election day setting, including those addressing the counting and certification processes, see here.
Written body-worn camera policies
For a list of all cases organized by state, see here. Friday, July 2.
Tuesday, May Monday, May 3. Monday, April Monday, March 8.
Monday, March 1. Thursday, February Monday, February Friday, February Tuesday, January Thursday, January Tuesday January Friday, January 8. Thursday, January 7. Saturday, January 2.
Thursday, December Friday, December Wednesday, December Monday, December Wednesday, December 9. Tuesday, December 8.
Monday, December 7. Friday, December 4.
Thursday, December 3. Wednesday, December 2. Monday, November Friday, November Wednesday, November Tuesday, November Thursday, November Saturday, November 7.
Friday, November 6. Thursday, November 5. Wednesday, November 4. Tuesday, November 3. Greater Birmingham Ministries v.
Body-worn camera overview
State of AlabamaNo. The second amended complaint alleges violations of the free dating Newport girls and 15th Amendments to the U. League of Women Voters of Alabama v. Merrillcv The complaint alleges state constitutional claims, including violations of Art. Status: Complaint filed May 28, ; Motions to dismiss granted August 5, People First of Alabama v.
Merrillcv N. Ala ; Nos. The amended complaint alleges violations of the 1st, 14th and 24th Amendments to the U. Greater Birmingham Ministries and individual Alabama residents on behalf of a class sued the State of Alabama, its secretary of state, and others, challenging state laws and procedures regarding Felony disenfranchisement.
The original class action complaint alleges violations of the 1st, 8th, executive search dating Gilbert reviews, 15th, and 24th Amendments to the U. The supplemental class action complaint adds additional plaintiffs and alleges unlawful deprivation of state-created right to vote and unlawful retroactive deprivation of the right to vote in violation of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and failure to specify eligibility requirements in violation of the National Voter Registration Act.
Alaska Center Pennsylvania appointment chatswood Fund v.
Institutional menu header
FenumiaiNo. The complaint alleges violations of the Alaska Constitution, in that the lack of notice and cure opportunity unduly burdens the right to vote and deprives Alaska voters of due process. Status: Complaint meet Davenport IA woman October 7, ; Motion for preliminary injunction denied October 15, ; Voluntarily dismissed December 9, Arctic Village Council v.
MeyerNo. Alaska, 3rd Jud. Anchorage ; No. S Sup. The Arctic Village Council, the League of Women Voters of Alaska, and two individual voters who live alone and are immunocompromised sued the Alaska chinese dating in Newport News governor, Alaska Division of Elections, and its director, challenging a state law requiring that absentee ballot certifications be notarized or ed by an adult witness, if a notary is not available.
Status: Complaint filed September 8, ; Motion for preliminary injunction granted October 5,holding that, during the pandemic, the witness requirement "impermissibly burdens the right to vote" and ening the witness requirement 40 dating Odessa TX the general election; Order affirming preliminary injunction issued by Supreme Court of Alaska October 12, ; Status conference scheduled for April 12, Disability Law Center of Alaska v.
Alaska ; No. The complaint alleges violations of the 1st, 14th, and 26th Amendment to the U. Kohlhaas v.
State of AlaskaNo. Date spots in San Diego California CA complaint alleges violations of the 1st and 14th Amendments to the U. Status: Complaint filed December 1, ; Amended complaint filed December 9, ; Motion to intervene granted December 28, Aguilera v. FontesNo. CV Ariz.
An individual voter and ten anonymous voters sued the Maricopa County recorder, the clerk and members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, and Maricopa County, claiming that voters who marked their ballots with sharpies, Park City UT date ideas by election workers, were disenfranchised when voting machines were unable to read their ballots, and poll workers refused to provide them with new ballots.
CVCV Ariz. Status: Complaint filed November 12, ; Motion to intervene filed by Arizona Democratic Party November 15, ; Motions to dismiss filed November 16, ; Case dismissed November 30, ; Notice of appeal filed December 28, Arizona Democratic Party v.
Status: Complaint filed October 13, ; Dismissed October 21, RodriguezNo. C Ariz. Status: Complaint filed October 13, ; Settled October 22, HobbsNo. Trump for President, Inc. Arizona Public Integrity Alliance v.
LC Ariz. The opening brief alleges violations of state law, in that the new instruction is unsupported by statute and deviates from the elections procedure manual promulgated by the secretary of state.
Status: Complaint filed August 25, ; Motions for preliminary injunction and to dismiss denied September speed dating dfw Green Bay WI, ; Reversed by Arizona Supreme Court September 10, Arizona Republican Party v. The complaint alleges violations of Arizona statutes, in that the law requires that two percent of precincts — not polling places — be audited.
Illinois state military museum
Bowyer v. DuceyNo. The complaint alleges violations of the Electors Clause of and the 14th Amendment to the U. Supreme Court December 15, ; Petition for writ of mandamus denied by U. Supreme Court March 1, Constitution, and seeks an order decertifying the of the presidential election. Status: Complaint filed December 7, ; Motion to dismiss and amended dating english Boston filed December 11, ; Case dismissed and notice of appeal filed December 15, ; Affirmed by Arizona Supreme Court January 5, ; Petition for writ of certiorari denied bosnian Carolina dating U.
Supreme Court May 3, Donald J. The Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee, and the Arizona Republican Party sued the Arizona secretary of state, the Maricopa County Recorder, and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, claiming that voters were disenfranchised when voting machines were unable to read their ballots, and poll workers did not provide them with new ballots.